The current research examined the sensed impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationships? (2) just how do the individuals feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s choice of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that most the individuals had been impacted by the social stress placed upon them. Furthermore, the individuals identified the previous generation as “racist”. Nonetheless, interestingly you will find signs and symptoms of an attitude shift that is generational. Finally, the findings show that more than 80 percent associated with the individuals failed to desire to interfere within their children’s partner selection. The rest of the 20 percent had been against interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages.
This will be a preview of membership content, access via your organization.
Purchase article that is single
Access immediately to the article PDF that is full.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Donate to journal
Immediate on the web access to all or any presssing problems from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.
Tax calculation will be finalised over here during checkout.
It must be noted that relationship is generally speaking not appropriate when you look at the Arab and Muslim community (among others) unless the couple’s intention is date solely (but, specific limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) along with the try to get hitched. Furthermore, in some instances, the approval for the female’s daddy ( or other significant male figure) is needed seriously to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed throughout the assortment of the information in purchase to respect individuals’ social traditions and spiritual observing.
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial relationship: Uncertainty, understanding, as well as the development of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and psychology that is socialpp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 415–447.
Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test for the contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three countries in europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.
Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating women that are jewish. nana10. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227.
Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing information that is qualitative Thematic analysis and rule development. Nyc, NY: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using analysis that is thematic therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous types of tradition. US Psychologist, 64, 194–204.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex therefore the social context of love and closeness. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.
Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.
Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Communication system participation in adolescents’ friendships and intimate relationships. Communication Yearbook, 10, 283–322.
Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American life. Indication, 26, 415–440.
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.
Felmlee, D. (2003). Discussion in internet sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). New York: Plenum.
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate partners’ perceptions of social networking features utilizing the passage through of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of competition for starting a connection. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the collection of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Homogamy and intermarriage: Reasons, patterns, styles. Yearly Review of Sociology, 395–421.
Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains for a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of females in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.
Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect together with development of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.
Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to create and implementation. London: Wiley.
Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a college campus that is small. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites additionally the growth of romantic relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies therefore the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Research, 10(1), 55–79.
Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults that are young. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.
Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social networking sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens for the social networking. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.
Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: the creative art and ways of qualitative meeting studies. Nyc: The Complimentary Press.
Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training fulfills conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort education that is promoting. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not absolutely all love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural dating and marriages in a conflict-ridden area. Middle East Journal.